17-07-2006
Hi Bernie,
Thank you for the welcome, but on seeing your list I just may have to
go away again. <big grin>
More to the point I would like to also thank you for all the
dedicated and thankless work you have done for both groups. A truly
outstanding effort that more people should acknowledge, I definitely
do.
I know only too well how many hours it takes and I was really
enjoying my 'holiday'. <g>
Down to work. I will not be able to answer all your questions in one
mail as my answers will be far too long, as well as needing more than
24 hours to do them justice.
I will answer one question at a time over a period of time.
For the sake of completeness they will be long posts and I make no
apologies.
I am sure that people know how to use their delete buttons and the
filter function on their computers.
As usual I express my opinion only, being fully aware of my many
limitations, and I am very appreciative of any constructive criticism
that will further my knowledge and the knowledge of others.
"What a load of rubbish" is not considered constructive criticism. <g>
Please quote a reference or base it on your experimental proof so
that we can follow it up, thank you. Unfortunately I do not have time
for endless debates with theorists, please do not take any offence if
I do not reply.
<... "1. Prepping water through the "cooking" process. It seems to
<... work, but to my knowledge, nobody using this process has gotten
The differences are minimal and as follows,
1. With the heated water there will be more oxidation from the
resultant steam release.
2. With the higher water temperature the spacers and insulators will
leech more chemicals into the water. With sufficiently high heat the
spacers will be damaged.
3. As you mentioned we also have all the effects caused by the
elevated current and heat upon the steel. Only some of these are
beneficial. Apart form the erosion, pitting, plating, and the
exposing of new metal we also have the release of metals in a very
fine colloidal suspension. These particles are so small that you will
not be able to easily filter them out, and they may be the cause of
some of the new type of bubble activity. As an example nickel is a
catalyst for hydrogen/oxygen reactions and will definitely be
involved in any bubble activity.
As the metal experiences far more serious heating during manufacture,
I would suggest that it is not the extra heat but the results of the
changed electrochemistry that would cause a difference.
BUT and this is the important but, that is not the end of the story.
With your system you then go and use this 'cooked' and 'filtered'
water to charge the cell.
And there in my opinion is the problem.
I will assume that all experienced experimenters agree that
the 'charge and magic' is in the water, and that charged water can be
used independently of the charging vat or cell.
As an example Joe carries his special charged water in an old glass
jar to use for healing and various other functions. This water was
not made in the transport jar.
It is also known that charged water can be poured into a new cell and
the cell will go to a stage 3.
Incidentally, my charged water has a definite and limited life, in my
case the potency is greatly reduced after three days. I mention this,
as Joe does not seem to have the same problem, apparently his charged
water is years old.
I the above paragraph I am very strongly stressing that the most
important component is the water, water that has been charged and
stored correctly.
So what is so special about the water and more importantly how
will 'cooking' it change anything?
I now cross the horizon into the land of metaphysics or as some
people call it (with a snicker) pseudo science.
I would like to bring up the topic of water memory. This topic is not
new, dozens of books have been written on the subject by great
scientists, and if you are not familiar with the topic I will mention
three of the most easily obtainable books.
1. Living Energies. Callum Coates. ISBN 0-46551-07-9. A book from a series covering the woks of Viktor Schauberger.
2. The Memory of Water. Michel Schiff. ISBN 0-7225-3262-8. A book covering the work of Benveniste.
3. Messages from Water. Masaru Emoto. ISBN 4-939098-00-1. A book covering the work of Masaru Emoto.
A. The common thread in these books (amongst many others) is that
water has a memory; it can 'remember' conditions, some of which are
the 'frequency' (Joe's favorite word) of the local environment,
including that of the operator of the cell as well as anybody or
anything that is within its 'sensing' range.
Be sensing range I do not mean that the reception range is limited by
distance, it is not. I mean that nearby frequencies can mask or
override distant frequencies. Just like when somebody is talking to
you whilst you are trying to hear a distant sound.
Everything is made up of 'vibrations' nothing is 'solid'. This
complex pool of 'frequencies' acts and reacts instantly and without
and limitations to what we perceive as distance. Water is a chief
player in this very complex 'soup'.
The water memory also tracks many rhythmic cycles including the sun,
moon, planets and many others. All these complex frequencies and
harmonics are stored in every water molecule.
This characteristic we call the memory of water.
B. This sum total of these frequencies has peaks and dips that vary
in any 24-hour cycle as well as much longer cycles that can extend
into many thousands of years.
This cyclic variation can and will affect the operation of the cell
and is one reason why a cell is not reliable.
C. Well known methods of modifying these frequencies are, heat,
radiation, unfavorable agitation and unnatural restrictions to its
flow.
Water is 'best' at 4 degrees C. A rise in temperature over this
optimum will cause a progressive destruction of the water memory.
The world's greatest and oldest scientist (Mother Nature) uses this
exact technique to purify water 'correctly' in an endless cycle.
In comparison modern water filtration and treatment technique does
water (and us) a great injustice, we only filter it, add more
chemical and redistribute it. No consideration for the water memory
whatsoever.
As a result the majority of treated water is 'dead', and in our
ignorance we then complain that the human race is sickly and behaving
strangely. <sad grin>
Mother Nature does the following.
1. The contaminated water runs via creeks, streams and rivers to end
up in the holding 'sump', the world's oceans. The chemicals fall out
of suspension as well as being leeched and absorbed by the seawater,
helped by the 'washing machine' action of the waves. Some of this
chemical brew drops to the ocean floor whilst the remaining majority
remains in suspension or combines to make seawater.
2. As a result of evaporation over the oceans the water vapor now
rises and starts forming clouds at suitable locations. At this point
due to the chemical losses and the heat acting on it, the water
is 'virginal' i.e. no 'harmful' memories.
3. As a result of the ozone ('made' by the UV from the sun), the
tumbling and mixing action of the wind and the lightning activity,
the water now acquires the resonant memory of our atmosphere (the
dielectric); this is the so-called Schumann resonance, of around 7.8,
14.1, 20.3, 26.4 and 32.5 Hz.
4. This water now "falls as a gentle rain upon the place beneath".
If this rain can reach the earth without passing through our mostly
polluted atmosphere we can call this water 'juvenile water'. Sadly,
in the present times this is a rare event.
The reason that I recommend this water over the more 'mature water'
is that it has all the 'right' frequencies and none of the
possible 'bad' ones.
Please note that for a healthy diet (intake of life force) the mature
water is more beneficial as it now has the additional chemical
contents as well.
Depending on the ultimate purpose of the cell both types of water
have their uses.
Irrespective of what anybody states, I have proven to myself over and
over that tap water is of no use for a cell that will be used for
tasks beyond the shandy stage on a car. Not even for cleaning any
part of the cell.
In passing it is also of little use for a person who needs more life
force. I refer to the elderly and sick.
Okay, after the lengthy 'preamble' we are finally here at the root of
your question.
1. By 'cooking ' the water we destroy any advantage that we may have
gained by using juvenile or mature water. Please note, in some cases
this may be a good thing, as our chosen 'special' water may
hold 'frequencies' that may be detrimental to our cell. 'Cooking'
will remove these.
2. The problem is that on cooling the water will pick up the
local 'vibes'. Depending on the location and the people present these
frequencies may be worse then what you started of with.
If you are working in a forest on top of a mountain and are in good
health and have a positive attitude, etc. etc. then the water will
pick up the Schumann frequencies as well as the local positive vibe
and all is well.
However if you are in a large city, working in a garage with
florescent lights, listening to your radio, have your mobile phone
on, have a sandwich in the microwave, the kettle on for the tea
drink, a fridge for the brown stuff, and you are getting frustrated
with the cell because it refuses to work for you, then my friend you
are behind the eight ball.
3. If you 'cook' tap water the situation is even worse. For when the
water cools it will have the frequencies of all the chemicals that
man puts in it to make it 'good' drinkable water.
These chemicals hinder the water from locking into the frequency of
the planet and the water can be considered as 'dead'.
Again please note. This is not a major hurdle for a cell running in
the shandy mode, as the periodic vacuum changes in the cell will help
in 'locking' it in.
In passing a well-known technique in reviving or 'recharging' a leaky
shandy cell is to drive the car and vary the vacuum load on the cell
by changing the load on the motor.
Now you may think that your 'cooking' of the water problems end with
the above.
Not so, I will now go even deeper into the depths of fringe science.
A very well known saying among true alchemists is that,
"The process of the work is very pleasing unto nature."
Basically the cell is a 'living' thing, just like a rock is also a
living thing.
What we are doing is enslaving the cell (which we have 'created' and
that is our 'frequency generator') to be our servant.
That is one reason that I stopped doing car conversions many years
ago for I consider it just about a sacrilege to utilize the life
force to propel a mix of very inefficient mechanical parts.
Or said differently, I do not want to waste the greatest gift from
the Creative Intelligence.
Now there are two ways of enslaving something. The slave can be a
willing slave (as in the case of free choice) or can be made a slave
with the use of fear and imprisonment.
I will give you an example.
The life force has an exact opposite, it is radiation or what we call
radioactivity, the ultimate 'death' of the life force.
In my deep ignorance and as part of my experimentation I used uranium
to force the cell into very rapid activity (just like Reich). This I
now see as extremely stupid, as I obtained a very unwilling slave, a
slave that took every possible chance to escape, to be radical, or
only perform when 'scared' with the uranium.
I also see the 'cooking' process as a means for enslaving an
unwilling participant, for the cell wants centripetal and not
centrifugal 'triggers'.
Both of the above processes are not "pleasing unto nature".
You may think me crazy as I have really departed the well-trodden
path, but take my input for what it is, my opinion.
In summary, I disagree with the 'cooking' of the water and then
charging the same water.
If the procedure has benefit and must be used, then use a new batch
of juvenile or mature water to charge the cell after this 'cleaning'
operation.
Nature has endless time, the slow charging of water, or short burst
of charging do not create much heat and it is my preferred method.
The water will be 'enslaved' when it wants to be, it will work with
you and not against you.
Joe knows the 'tricks' to make this occur just about on demand. Sadly
I do not have this ability, it took me a year to get a cell to a true
stage three.
Your method may seem to work, and it does seem to look quick and
easy, but as usual 'haste makes waste'. You will find that the water
that has been 'cooked' will rarely go to a deep stage 3 (for reasons
as explained above) and the cell will be a very poor 'servant', i.e.
not much 'power' output as a result.
In closing question number 1, please remember that the above is my
opinion only, and I may be completely on the wrong track as I
cannot 'see' like Joe, I only grope along as best as I can.
Kind regards,
Alex
17-07-2006.