09-10-2000
The inspiration, for this section belongs to Walter Russell, a truly amazing
being. I have used his great genius and imagination to allow me to explain to
you how I think the Joe cell may function.
From " Beyond the Atom ".
There is a neutral ether consisting of countless myriads of inconceivably small
particles per cubic centimetre having no electric charge and no mass. Universal
mind places electrostatic charges on these particles when there is a suitable
magnetic field so that the become charged particles. The complexity of the
charge determines the type of charged particle and its behaviour.
The above should explain several points to the average reader; namely;
* As aether, ( Orgone ) has no mass or electric charge it makes it very
difficult to measure. If you read about the efforts that science has gone to, in
their efforts to measure gravity waves and neutrinos, you will more fully
comprehend the problems of measuring these " forces ".
Suffice to say, that just because scientists cannot measure Orgone energies does
not mean that Orgone does not exist.
THE AIM.( of the manual )
To run a conventional 23% efficiency Otto cycle internal combustion motor on a
new form of massless energy ( Orgone ), for a period of time that will ( as a
first step at least ) prove that said the concept is feasible.
REQUIREMENTS.
1. A flow of the chosen energy ( Orgone ) in the vicinity of our accumulator
of a sufficient quantity and polarity to cater for the consumption needs of the
desired motor.
2. A soak, polariser or accumulator for the above energy, made up of an
enclosure of a design that will hold an accumulated charge of Orgone, for a
reasonable period of time. For our initial testing, two hours will be long
enough to prove the concept.
3. A transfer pipe or similar medium that will allow for the shift or
interchange of the stored energy into the chosen motor.
4. The normal depression of the Otto cycle motor to cause the controlled
intake of the ambient air into the combustion chamber/s.
5. The normal timing system that we can adjust to suit our discharge point of
the high energy Kettering ignition pulse.
6. The normal water jacketed, enclosed combustion chamber, valving, piston,
connecting rod and crankshaft to allow us to utilise the pressure conversion in
the above enclosed chamber.
7. A method of sustaining and controlling the above 6 steps.
* Please note that you may get effects different from the desired ones.
As the Joe cell geometry, Orgone density, polarity, chemistry, electrolysis,
location, materials and experimenters field vary from cell to cell, the Joe cell
will thus produces a whole series of different effects for different
experimenters. The cell can lose ' weight ', cause rain to fall, heal people or
make people sick, " create " various elements and even do what you want it to
do, ie. power an internal combustion motor as per step 7 above.
So, how does a Joe cell ' run ' a car? Or more correctly, how does it act as an
energy source to power the motor?
Again I will stick my neck out and suggest an answer that makes sense to me.
Obviously it is a theory and is only in place until a reader suggests a better
theory, in which case I will remove mine and insert his with full credits.
Lets take a common and familiar item, namely any type of battery used to power
most of our portable devices.
Have you ever considered exactly what occurs when you use a battery for your
radio, torch, etc. I mean what is in the battery that makes your device work and
why does it ( the battery ) go flat?
There are many chemical and electrical ways of explaining the process, but I
would like to explain it to you from a slightly different perspective.
Let me set the stage:
A. Man is surrounded by all the vast energy of the universe, yet it will not
work for him while it is in equilibrium. For example, you do not feel the
tremendous energies around you or even the ones that are penetrating you.
considered at a deeper level your body and the ' You ' does, but that is a
different topic .
We have to somehow unbalance this equilibrium to reap the rewards of the return
to balance of the force that we have unbalanced.
So, if we use the Joe cell as a brake, a one way valve, a damper, a soak or as a
non-linear device, we can slow down or unbalance the normal equilibrium of the
aether ( Orgone ) flow, and we now have the capacity to do work in the
consequential release of this unbalance to the status quo.
B. Every unbalanced action must eventually be balanced no matter how long it
takes. Remember that I have mentioned in my manual the great clue, ' Rhythmic
balanced interchange. 'All things in creation including our battery and the Joe
cell obey this fundamental rule.
C. Electricity is dividing a pressureless condition into two opposite
pressures which desire release and thus a return to a state of balance. So our
torch battery for example, does not want to have a positive and negative pole (
unbalance ) and is thus trying to return to a state of balance ie. eventually
the battery will go ' flat ' the duration of unbalance ( servicable life of
battery ) depending on how much work we ask it to do. At this stage the balance
is returned as there is no potential difference.
D. Work is the result of unbalanced matter seeking a rest in balance. Notice
how we make our battery work for us by letting it return to a state of balance,
only after doing some work, in this case heating up a thin piece of tungsten
wire to incandescence and thus producing light. This return to balance results
in work being done, JUST AS IN THE JOE CELL!!! In the case of the Joe cell, we
use a pressure/volume differential. More on this soon.
E. So the charge of the battery, ( or the Joe cell ) is a pressureless
condition separated into two opposite pressures.
F. A charged battery is dually unbalanced by the opposite pressures which
desire release, exactly as in the Joe cell.
Pease note, opposites oppose, they never perform any other function than to
oppose. Opposites are not things; they are conditions.
Okay, if we look at the above clues and this time using the car battery as an
example, we can readily see that the electrolysis that occurred in the battery
when we charged it via the car alternator has created an unbalance that is
frantically trying to return to a state of balance.
If you do not believe me and if you are foolish enough, just put a screw driver
across the terminals of a large charged car battery and watch it melt and
disappear.
On second thought, please don't do it, take it as fact<grin>.
In like manner, when we charged the Joe cell, ( which is also acting as an
accumulator of sorts ) we have created an unbalanced condition that is also
frantically trying to return to a state of balance.
A car battery reaches a state of balance by finding an electrical path ( a
conductive circuit ), either in the battery ( self discharge ) or outside the
battery into a resistive load eg. your ignition system.
The Joe cell reaches a state of balance if you accidentally short the cell when
it is charged, or in the combustion chamber of the car by using the timed spark
plug spark or a similar electronic ' trigger ' to allow it to drop to a lower or
balanced density ( the state it was in before you forced it to do work ).
The result of the Joe cell ' working ' is translated into an expansion of the
intake air charge and thus the forcing of the piston down the bore to turn the
crankshaft etc.
Now a few words of mine should fall into place for you. A stage 3 cell is
charged ie. has sufficient unbalance to do work. A leaky cell is a self
discharging cell. A balanced or stage 1 cell cannot perform work. As mentioned,
to make the cell work, we must have an efficient transfer to the point where the
work is required, ie. we must contain the unbalanced condition until it is in
the combustion chamber/s by using the right type of geometry, cone, tube, blind
plug, motor and electrical connection.
The Joe cell accumulator is constantly trying to return to a state of balance (
leaking ) and given the slightest excuse will return to balance and thus be
useless to you.
As you build up you familiarity with your cell, you will find that the cell is
constantly giving you small clues as to what it is doing. As such working with
the Joe cell is an interactive exercise and developing the skills of a good
observer will be highly beneficial.
Supporting arguments for above theory.
* A fundamental principle:
A change in pressure of any substance changes its volume. An indicator for the
change is a change in temperature. A motor running on the Joe cell experiences a
great drop in temperature as a verification of expansion and not explosion at
work.
* Every atom varies its pressure from its exterior to its nucleus. Thus, if
temperature is changed, its volume also changes.
Every kind of atom in a substance, is in a different plane and each plane is the
pressure wall of one of the varying pressure compartments which divides this
universe of motion into pressure zones.
Pressure has its opposites. These are:
The electric pressure of contraction, which pulls inwards from within.
The magnetic pressure of expansion, which pushes outward from within.
The greater the positive charge, the greater the pressure of contraction.
The greater the pressure of contraction, the less the volume.
The greater the negative discharge, the greater the pressure of expansion.
Thus, in the Joe cell, our negative discharge creates an expansion that pushes
the piston down the bore and does work. The expansion also creates the drop in
temperature.
This great axial activity means less solidity AND it also means preponderance of
expansion pressure towards a LOW potential. That is, the Orgone returns back to
its normal balanced state.
The above is due to:
* The high contraction pressure has become preponderantly expansive.
* The high potential has become low potential.
* The low axial activity has become great axial activity.
* The restricted volume has become extended volume.
* The great density has become low density.
and very interestingly, that which we call weight has been reduced as far as the
gravitational effects of this planet are concerned.
***************************************************************
Two alternative suggestions.
1. Blacklight Power Inc.
Web site for this topic is ( http://www.blacklightpower.com )
The inventor of BlackLight Power's technology and founder is Dr. Randell L
Mills. His theory is the existence of previously undiscovered lower energy
states of hydrogen. Mills calls these lower energy states of hydrogen ( hydrinos )
and dihydrinos. This theory of lower energy states of hydrogen has the
potential to change everything that we understand about physics and the physical
world. Now before you get excited by the above, please realise that Walter
Russell listed many, many elements lower than hydrogen on the periodic table way
back in 1926! Similarly is we call Orgone ( hydrinos ) we are back to square one
ie. the massless force that is at the base of all things. Needless to say, other
scientists think that Dr. Mills claims are preposterous.
Traditional physicists claim that the " ground " state of the hydrogen atom is
the lowest energy state possible. According to the " experts ", all levels of
the hydrogen atom are accounted for in quantum mechanics. As far as the majority
of physicists are concerned, there is nothing to suggest that other levels
exist.
It turns out that a fundamental error in physics ignored the existence of a
second non-radioactive form of hydrogen which is an inert gas, ( just like
Orgone, what a coincidence! <grin> ).Low energy hydrogen can be made from
ordinary hydrogen when its electrons orbit drops to about one twentieth its
" normal " size. When this happens ( in a vacuum at about 2,500 deg. Kelvin with
potassium vapour as the catalyst ) the hydrogen atom release up to one thousand
times as much energy as needed to get hydrogen from water. This means a lot of
energy is available with no pollution at all. In theory a 200 hp car using this
system could go 100,000 miles on the hydrogen in a single tank of water. Art. B.
Rosenblum.
The byproduct of Mill's chemical reaction is a hydrino, the lower energy
hydrogen atom. It is chemically inert and floats into space in much the same way
helium( or Orgone ) in a balloon floats in space. Kendall
Lets sum it up. The creation of hydrinos from hydrogen create a vast amount of
heat and thus useable power. But what would happen when the hydrinos from the
sun or the Joe cell interact with the water in the motor and/or the air in the
combustion chambers? Under the influence of a high electrical disturbance eg.
spark-plug or similar, would we get an expansion in the combustion chamber/s and
a resultant drop in temperature? If so then the hydrinos equate to Orgone and I
have no arguments with Dr. Mills. I would suggest that you go to the Blacklight
Power site as shown above and make up your own mind.
2. Muon hydrogen.
I Quote the following:
The Muonic hydrogen (MUH) group is a research collaboration of physicists based
at ;
" http://www.triumf.ca/homepage.html "
(note from the webmaster: this link is not working, I have found some who does. see below)
http://www.triumf.ca/welcome/h-fusion.html
http://www.triumf.ca/muh/muh.html
http://www.triumf.info/public/
The group attempts to understand the reactions involving muons and different
isotopes of hydrogen, as well as muon catalysed fusion.
A muon is an elementary particle which can have a negative or positive charge
and has approximately 207 times the mass of an electron. The MUH group works
with negatively charged muons, which carry the same charge as an electron. These
muons are produced at TRIUMF by directing a beam of
hydrogen ions (protons) moving at 3/4 the speed of light at a target consisting
of beryllium or carbon. In this way particles called pions are produced, and
shortly these pions decay to become muons. Unfortunately the muon has an average
lifetime of 2.2 microseconds (or millionths of a second), and one challenge when
working with muons is to use them efficiently before they decay.
There are three isotopes (varieties) of hydrogen atoms. First there is protium
(H), by far the most common of the three, which has one proton (a massive
positively charged particle) as its nucleus. Then there is deuterium (D), whose
nucleus is made up of one proton and one neutron (slightly more massive than a
proton with no electric charge) bound together as a deuteron (d). About 0.015%
of all hydrogen atoms in nature are deuterium. Finally there is tritium (T),
with a proton and two neutrons forming a triton (t) to make up the nucleus.
Unfortunately tritium, though very useful in these experiments, is radioactive
and its safe containment is a major concern.
Any two of these isotopes will be bound together by orbiting electrons to form a
hydrogen molecule (the most common of which is 2 protiums making normal hydrogen
gas).
Beyond reactions involving muons and hydrogen, the MUH group is concerned with
creating muon catalysed fusion. Unlike other fusion processes, muon catalysed
fusion can be carried out at room temperatures or (as is the case in this group)
at about 3 degrees Kelvin (-270 degrees Celsius).
To create muon catalysed fusion, a beam of negative muons is stopped in layers
of solid hydrogen isotopes. A muon will then replace the electron in a hydrogen
atom. The muon can then bind the two atoms together in a special muonic molecule
or molecular ion. Since the muon is 207 times as
massive as the electron, the hydrogen atoms are bound together far more tightly,
so that the nuclei can fuse, creating energy and ejecting the muon.
Theoretically, the same muon could go on to catalyse many more reactions,
creating enough energy for this process to be used as a power source. However,
sometimes the muon sticks to a charged fusion product such as an alpha particle,
and is lost to the cycle. Over 100 fusions per muon have been recorded in other
experiments but it is estimated that with the current equipment it would take
somewhat more than this in order to "break even" energy-wise.
The goal of clean, inexpensive energy from this source may be far in the future
if ever attained, so don't look for portable Muon Catalysed Fusion generators on
the market any time soon.
More information can be found in the MUH contribution to the TRIUMF
"http://www.triumf.ca/muh/doc/annrep/annrep94.ps"
"http://www.triumf.ca/muh/pics/"
"http://www.triumf.ca/muh/muh.html"
End of quote.
So this theory rests on the presumption that if you put moun-hydrogen in the
presence of a spark, then some of the electrons could replace the muons. The now
normal hydrogen atoms would expand and the spare muons would decay and the
resultant expansion would do the work. See;
( http://ourworld.cs.com/elhoreth/hydr.html ). (sorry, I can't find that one)
Again dear friends we are calling the same rose by a different name. At the end
of the day it does not matter in the least as to what the name of the force is
as long as we know its cause and not just use the effect as we have been doing.
You will find out that sooner or later, our scientists will have to admit that
they have no idea as to the causes of our present forces. Only when we admit
that our sum knowledge of the causes of energies can be written on the head of a
pin with 10 meter high letters, will we start to really learn.
*******************************************************