11-02-2004
Orgone, Cell Operation, Experimental Results.
Subjects:
1. Clarification on the definition of orgone.
2. Additional information on cell operation.
3. Some recent experimental results.
Clarification on the definition of orgone.
Some recent views expressed on the Joe cell forum are at odds with what
is scientifically known about the attributes of orgone.
As some of you know, I have covered this topic at length, both in my book and in several updates.
Yet, for reasons best known to the individuals concerned, they do not
want to do a web or library search on orgone, and are thus left in the
dark.
Additionally, some members want orgone defined in their favourite terms
and yet others seem to differentiate between orgone, the ‘ Y ’ factor
and the life force of the individual.
As always, my aim is to share my research and any helpful finds with
all and sundry, for unless we share unselfishly and unconditionally we
are doomed to extinction.
I quote, “ The evolution of man is the evolution of his doing, and ‘
doing ’ cannot be the result of things which ‘ happen ’ ”.
Does it really matter who thought of ‘ it ’ first or how many letters of the alphabet is behind a persons name?
There are 260 members on the Joe cell group and countless ‘ lurkers ’.
Just image the result of all this experimental brain power, sharing and
working as a team. Why are we not doing it?
End of commercial, moving on:
Orgone.
In 1960, three years after the death of Wilhelm Reich, The Interscience
Research Institute ( later to be known as the Radix institute ) was
founded. The Institute’s journal was called ‘ The Creative Process ’
and contained many enlightening articles by many luminaries.
Charles. R. Kelly was one of the founders and wrote an article ‘ What
is Orgone Energy ? ’ for the first lecture of the society held at the
Hewitt Auditorium, New York city, May 9, 1962.
I would like to quote this article ( a very small part ) for the group.
I also acknowledge Mr. Kelly as the author of same.
“ What is orgone energy? ”
“ Franz Anton Mesmer called it animal magnetism; Charles von
Reichenbach called it odyle. To Henri Bergson it was the elan vital (
the vital force ), whilst to Hans Driesch it was entelechy. Sigmund
Freud observed its function in human emotions and termed it libido.
William MacDougall, the great British-American psychologist of a
generation ago, labelled it hormic energy.
Dozens if not hundreds, of lesser-known scientists have recognised its
presence and have given it a name to characterise its special
properties. Among the 20th-century proponents of the concept are, for
example, Doctor Charles Littlehead and his vital magnetism and George
Starr White and his cosmo-electric energy.
Mechanistic science in the 17th through the 19th centuries embraced
many of its essential qualities in the concept of the ether , while
mystical human beings embraced other essential qualities of it in the
concept of God.
Orgone energy is the Wilhelm Reich’s term for the substratum from which
all nature is created. The best definition this author can provide for
it is this:
Orgone energy is the creative force in nature. ”.
The article by Mr. Kelley than goes on to explain in depth about the
discovery of orgone and the works of a great and forgotten scientist,
Wilhelm Reich. Please realise that Reich was not an arm-chair theorist.
He had a staff of around 60 scientists and they spend years on hands-on
research.
Orgone is not a theory, on the contrary it is a force that the majority
of conventional scientists are not familiar with. That however does not
mean that it does not exist.
Think about it, the greatest library of knowledge that the world knew (
the library of Alexandria ) was burned to the ground, Reich papers were
all burned and banned as well. What was the common thread?
Dear reader, there is a wealth of information on orgone and Reich.
I would suggest a read of ‘ The Creative Process ’ journals that covers
1961 to 1965, although they may be difficult to source.
A leading modern orgone source is the work of James DeMeo and his
Orgone Biophysical Research Laboratory. He has a wealth of material on
Reich, as well as making most of Reich’s book available for purchase.
His journals are called ‘ The pulse of the Planet ’ and more
information can be obtained by e-mail from orders@orgonelab.org
An example would be his current journal ‘ Heretic’s notebook ’, ISBN 0-9621855-8-2, retail $24.00 US.
To say that the cell does not ‘ operate ’ on/with orgone is like saying that nature does not have a creative force.
Yes, orgone is in you and the cell and everything else as well, thus ‘
positive ’ inter-reaction with your experiment is vital, to ignore
orgone ( the Y factor ) is guaranteed failure. If you do not like to
call it orgone then by all means call it by some of the more ‘ trendy
’names, it will work just the same. <g > .
2 Additional information on cell operation.
I strongly sympathise with experimenters that are not getting results,
I care not for the armchair theory brigade. Talking the talk is easy,
anybody can do it, walking the walk is far more difficult, it shows
that the individual has made a commitment in time and money. That is
where I am coming from and that is the people that I want to work with.
Please realise, “ To ‘ know ’ and to ‘ know how to ’ are two different
things, and the ‘ knowing how to do ’ is not created by knowledge
alone. A man who knows a great many words, is deemed to understand a
great deal-again excepting, of course any sphere of practical activity
wherein his ignorance very soon becomes evident. ”. Amen.
It seems to me that a lot of failures in cell work are due to the
experimenters simply not knowing what they want to build. The question
is, if the person does not know what to build, how can he possibly
build it?
Interestingly enough, most of the success has come from individuals
that had no idea what a Volt or a Watt is, they build the cell by
intuition. Now surely there is a message here?
I will try to lift some more fog from the subject that may help some to ‘ see ’.
The ‘talking the talk ’ that I want to share with you is backed up, and
is a working fit with ‘ walking the walk ’, thus it is a workable
theory.
First, go to www.pathcurve.com and read the section on Vortex
generators. Read it twice and then read it again, until you understand
the concept. Read as far as the end of the section on oxygen, the rest
is not related to the cell.
Okay, do you understand it? What is covered is the explanation of how
the cell works as written in my book, but seen from another
perspective. I asked you to read this version as it is not specifically
cell related, and thus it may give your brain another ‘ slant ’ on the
topic.
Now, in your mind, substitute the pathcurve vortex generator for the Joe cell.
* Can you see that the electric/magnetic field of the rotating electron
is tilted by the North/South magnetic field generated along the
vertical axis of the Joe cell?
* Can you see that the Neutral sheet or the Bloch wall is ‘ warped ’
along the central cross section of the Joe cell cylinder stack, and
that this is the reason why we have the two bubble flows?
The two bubble flows are from the top water surface to the mid point of
the cylinder stack, and from the mid point to the bottom of the
cylinder stack. This can be seen on the very poor quality video from
Nutech as well as being described by many as the figure eights patterns.
* Can you see that the warped neutral sheet is the ‘ pump ’ ( and
flywheel ) that uses this non liner transfer of orgone energy to run
the cell?
A fundamental law is the ‘ The Law of Three ’. Quoting from ‘ In Search of the Miraculous ’, Gurdjieff states:
“ Every phenomenon on whatever scale and in whatever world it may take
place in, from molecules to cosmic phenomena, is the result of the
combination or the meeting of three different and opposing forces. One
force, or two forces, can never produce a phenomenon. The presence of a
third force is necessary, for it is only with the help of a third force
that the first two can produce what may be called a phenomenon, no
matter in what sphere.”.
In the case of the Joe cell we have the two teams ( ‘ positive ’ and ‘
negative ’ vortexial forces ) playing on the so called ‘ neutral sheet
’ football ground.
Thus the play between positive and negative will cause the neutral
sheet to ‘ warp ’, as a result of the imbalance in the two forces ( the
strength of the acting North/South magnetic fields on the warp ). This
imbalance causes the warp, and the warp is our energy ‘ pump ’.
* Can you see that any stray magnetic field ( or surrounding the cell
with magnets, etc. ) will disrupt the correct tilting of the electron
field and thus stop the atom vibrations?
A strongly magnetised seam on a cylinder is enough to stop the
formation of the ‘ pump ’. That goes for any strong external magnetic
or electromagnetic fields. This can be car wiring, mobile phones, power
lines, etc.
Normally the cone on top of the cell will encourage the ‘ North ’
magnetic field formation, and the flat bottom will discourage the ‘
South ’ magnetic field formation. In a glass test cell the open top and
the closed bottom will achieve a similar result.
If however this in not sufficient to start the ‘ pump ’ ie. stage 2, an
addition of a precisely controlled magnetic field ( South pole up ) and
concentric with the bottom of the cylinder pack will enhance the action.
I have used a 5 inch ferrite speaker magnet ( 1 inch from the bottom of
the cylinder stack ) with good results, you can actually see the water
spin.
* You should now be able to see the ‘ three stages of the cell ’ from another perspective, namely;
stage 1 the pump did not start, stage 2 the pump started and then
stopped, stage 3 the pump keeps running and stage 4, the pump is not
influenced by stray external fields.
I would love to be able to do that, ( stage 4 that is ). <g >.
Additional to the above, Malcolm Rae, the great radionics expert had
something to say that bears directly to this subject.
In an article for the ‘ Radionics Quarterly ’, Malcolm wrote;
Q. 10. What is the source of the energy which creates thought?
A. 10. It is a facet of magnetism.
Q. 11. What are its characteristics?
A. 11. ( 1 ) It occupies a field around every magnet, including the
earth, and has an ‘ intake ’ at the theoretical centre of the magnet,
and a potential output around the entire periphery of the magnet.
( 2 ) The field is believed to be an ultra high frequency spectrum of
standing waves - ie. pulsations without actual outward travel away from
the source, containing characteristics of every thought possible to any
human, past, present, or future. ”
Again there is a reference to the Bloch wall and a mention of this
location as an “ intake ” which fits in nicely with the concept of some
form of orgone pump, accumulator or one way valve.
A couple of small notes:
* Some people seem to be a little confused with the term ‘ stage ’. You
do not have to progress from stage 1 to 2 and then to 3, a cell can
start as a 3, or stay as a stage 1 forever.
I created the stages as an aid to explain to the reader as to what was
occurring with the ‘ pump ’, it serves no other purpose.
* I will mention again that by having the central cylinder as a
negative, we form a centripetal ‘ beam ’ of energy that can be pointed
in the desired direction with our wave guide or transfer tube. This
enhanced energy flow can now be utilised as required.
A central positive connection will perform entirely different functions
and is not the way to go if you are primarily interested in making a
car perform on the Joe cell.
3 Some recent experimental results.
* I have found by experimentation that a positive or negative stage 3
cell can be formed with equal ease. This can be seen by Redox
measurements as the formation of mirror image damped oscillatory waves.
As expected, the positive wave remain mainly ‘ above the zero line ’
and thus reads mainly positive millivolts. The negative damped wave
reads mainly in negative millivolts values. I personally prefer the ‘
negative ’ cell and most of my research is in that direction.
It would be interesting to experiment with two cells, one positive and
one negative. For example, these are the two orgone types present at
the union of the sperm and the egg between male and female.
It is interesting how modern scientists use an electrical spark to
start ‘ life ’ when fusing sperm and egg, very much as to what we can
do with two alternate vortexing Joe cells.
I would not be surprised at the wondrous things that could result in
the combination of two cells. Lets face it, we are dealing with life
itself and Walter Russel fully explained how the opposing polarity
vortexes are the keys to life.
* Ren has passed on my message to the group of the importance of not
adding water or topping up a stage 3 cell. It took me years to realise
that the very delicate ‘ pump ’ action, and the resultant formation of
large clumps of water molecules is very easily broken up.
I would suggest to the experimenter that once they are able to get a
cell to go to stage 3, not to change the water. The charge is in the
water and apart from occasional charging to compensate for the ‘
leakage ’, if it is working, leave it alone.
In a laboratory situation ( a bench in my garage < g > ), I have
used the same charged water for about two years. Obviously in a car
situation ( unless you have a stage 4 cell setup ) all the varying
external fields will kill the cell much quicker.
For car applications I suggest a vat and cone charger setup. This can be used to replenish a ‘ dead ’ cell.
The cell will last far longer in the car if the radiator water is also
stage 3. Again a vat type charge will supply the required amount of
water.
* Dear experimenter, I strongly disagree with the recent suggestion to
the group, ie. to apply a potential to the cell and live it on
permanently. The result is heat, heat is molecular agitation, and
molecular agitation of the wrong type will destroy your delicately
balanced atom vibrations, with the resultant loss of warp to the
neutral sheet and thus a dead cell.
Not to mention that constant current to the cell is electrolysis, and
electrolysis is ion flow. The resultant stripping of the cylinders and
the ‘ mud ’ that is created is not the way to go.
In closing, dear reader, please share, for:
“ No one can ascend onto a higher step until he places another in his
own place. What a man has received he must immediately give back; only
then can he receive more.
Otherwise from him will be taken even what he has already been given. ”
***************************************