10-01-2005
"
Y Factor, disregard it! "
Introduction.
Many time have I heard the above sentiment, namely, " Lets get on with designing a Joe cell using scientific methods and forget the Y-factor mumbo-jumbo."
Many people that show interest in the principles of the Joe cell design lose interest the moment they read that the cell utilizes energies that were not covered during their formal 'education'.
For some unknown reason their logic goes along the lines of:
"My professor/teacher/lecturer/etc. and I have not heard about it, thus it cannot exist. ".
Or even worse, "I have not seen anything about it on the TV or read anything about it in the papers or topical magazines."
Sure, you can attempt to design the world fastest car and ignore air pressure, or you can attempt to design the world's best submarine and disregard water pressure, or you can attempt to design the world's best Joe cell and disregard the Y-factor.
The results will be the same in each case, dismal failure.
The Joe cell is a set of cylinders full of water, and yet it is none of these things. It is far, far more than we can deduct with our very limited senses, and equally limited test equipment.
Yes, I fully agree, let us use a scientific method. But what is a 'scientific method'?
Science is Latin for 'knowledge', and it defines any systematic field of study that by any and every means possible tries to produce reliable explanations and effects.
Thus we cannot leave out parameters that are in the 'too hard' box, and only use easy laws and simple test equipment to get a reliable result!
If you want to gain 'knowledge' about a Joe cell, then you must look at the total picture, Y-factor and all. Verily I say to you, that unless you look you will not find, and to look means to even look beyond the comfortable confines that is regarded as present day conventional scientific law.
If your brain hurts after trying to come to grips with the Y-factor, that's okay, leave it to somebody else and get on with what you are good at. We were not made all the same, and we are definitely not all here to learn the same lesson.
In the following section I have given you some examples of the interaction of human with external devices and vice versa. These may help those that need (and want) help.
Whatever you do, please do not disregard the subtle link between all things; do not throw out the baby with the bath water.
Examples.
Example 1.
(Quoted in part from 'Alien Energy').
"Recent experiments undertaken by a consortium of eminent physiologists and medical scientists at the Department of physiology of the School of Medicine at Showa University in Tokyo, have demonstrated that certain talented individuals can create bio-magnetic field strengths 1,000 times stronger than that normally detected in the human body.
This implied that the individuals were defying the laws of physics and producing incredibly strong bio-magnetic fields by substituting the necessary bio-electric current with some kind of X-factor."
Example 2.
(Quoted in part from 'Alien Energy').
"Between 1977 and 1979 William A. Tiller of the Department of Materials Science and engineering at Stanford University began experimenting with 'focused human attention', or psychokinetic (PK) effects.
Repeated experiments with thousands of subjects over a three-year period admirably demonstrated that when a person brought his or her hands close to the grounded electrode, there would be an intermittent and sometimes sustained increase in the count rate.
However, sometimes no one would be able to achieve an increase count rate for periods of up to several days at a time, and yet no correlation were ever found in respect to matters such as rain storms, lunar phases, etc.
On other occasions, when in another part of the lab discussing other topics while the system was running only a few counts were recorded. If attention suddenly turned to matters concerning the cell, the detector would often begin chattering and producing a substantial number of counts.
The results of these extraordinary tests were quite remarkable. The revised experiments showed that a subject did not need to place his or her hands around the detector to obtain an increased count rate; one had only to use the mind."
Example 3.
('Messages from water').
Masaru Emoto (Doctor of Medicine alternativa) performed over 10,000 experiments over 4 years with the growth of water crystals.
The experiments show with great clarity that water crystals will have differing crystal structures as a result of being conditioned by music, prayer, emotion, intent, environment, etc.
At no stage is there any physical contact or manipulation of the test sample.
The book is a very beautiful pictorial proof, demonstrating that we can interact with water without physical contact.
I will leave it to the interested reader to dig further.
Example 4.
(The memory of water).
Covers some of the work of Jacques Benveniste. In collaboration with 12 other scientists, Benveniste performed experiments which he believes demonstrates that water can retain the memory' of molecules it once contained.
If this is true, the laws of biochemistry would have to be completely rethought.
Thus we have 'action at a distance', e.g. the chemical information of molecules can travel through water.
An interesting observation that comes out of his research is the fact that 'activated water' loses its potency at around 70 degrees centigrade. This suggests that there may be a common mechanism for the ability of water to resist a degree of thermal agitation.
I bring up the above point to again remind the experiment not to 'cook' his Joe cell. Prolonged electrolysis (and thus heat) will not get the cell the seed, on the contrary it will kill it.
Remarks.
I have chosen the above 4 examples from a large list of scientific works that prove (to me at least) that:
1. We can influence and be influenced by the rest of creation. This should not be surprising as all matter is made up of complex wave motion and associated harmonics. We all live in a sea of energy made up of complex wave structures.
Nothing is 'solid'; this view is an illusion that result from our limited perception.
2. Like all things, the Joe cell is made up of complex waves and harmonics. These are in a 'sea' of many millions of wave fronts from the rest of 'matter' in this Universe.
3. Each person has his unique multi-wave 'signature'. This signature will react with the signature from the Joe cell. Some frequencies will be constructive, whilst others will be destructive to the 'life' of the cell.
This interaction can cause the cell to die, or to spring to life. Radiations from most 'man-made' electrical devices will also react with the Joe cell and have similar effects to the man/cell interaction.
Reactions with man made 'noise' is usually negative as compared to the reactions with the natural 'beats' as enema ting from nature.
4. The cell will also generate 'waves' that will affect the experimenter (and devices in the near locality). These can be beneficial or harmful. The result is dependent on the intent and mindset of the 'owner' of the cell as well as the effect of many local fields.
The cell 'output' can make a car 'run', it can change the 'mass' of nearby objects and it can also make a person very healthy or very sick.
5. The cell states vary in a very irregular way over any period of time. I am at a loss to find any single cause for this action.
Much more work will have to be done before we understand the many complexities of what seems (at fist glance) to be a very simple and basic device.
Until an organized effort (read well funded) is launched to try to seriously come to grips with the causes, rather than merely the effects of the unknown forces, I have to sadly concede that the efforts of many uncoordinated 'back-yard' experimenters (including myself) does not look too promising in coming up with a final solution.
Summary.
To ignore the Y-factor is a guaranteed method of never getting to grips with the cause of the cells operation.
You may utilize the cell for its effects, but you will always be a slave to its idiosyncrasies and never the master.
References.
Collins Andrew, 'Alien Energy', 1994. ISBN 0-940829-37-1, www.andewrcollins.net
Emoto Massaaru, 'Messages from water', Issue 8 Nov 2000. Published by HADO Kyoikusha, Sold by I.H.M. Co. Ltd. Tokyo, Tel. 81-3-3866-3592.
Michel, Schiff, 'The memory of water', ISBN 0-7225-3262-8, Thorsons publishing 1995.
Seto A. et al, 'Detection of Extraordinary Large Bio-magnetic Field Strength from Human Hand during External Qi Emission'.
Acupuncture & Electro-therapeutics Res. Int. Journal, Vol 17, 1992, pp. 75-94.
Tiller W. A. 'A Gas Discharge Device for Investigating Focused Human Attention'. Journal of Scientific Exploration', Vol 4 No 2, 1990, pp 255-71.
Alex Schiffer.
***********************************
Next Update
Update Index
Main Page
Experimenter Guide to the Joe Cell
Plans and pictures
Joe Cell Photo Page