08-02-2002
The Cell and ' Zero Point Energy '.
Zero Point Energy.
On the temperature scale, absolute zero is -273.15( C or zero degrees Kelvin.
At this temperature, as there is no ' heat ', the capacity for doing work ( energy ) should be zero.
Some scientists do however agree that as the energy present at his
temperature is not thermal, it is plausible that there is ' Sea of
Energy ' or an aether or similar that has short lived ' virtual '
elementary particles capable of doing ' work '.
Refer to Dirac ( 1930 ), Gamow ( 1966 ) and many others as well as a short mention in my update ' Negative Electricity '
( 10-12-2001 ).
A related book on the engineering principles for Free Energy is " Quest
For Zero Point Energy " by Moray B. King ISBN: 0-932813-94-1, published
by Adventures Unlimited Press.
Conservation of energy.
To have ' Free Energy ', we have to break some well established laws.
But, laws are meant to be broken as and when better laws come along to
replace the flawed existing ones.
Thus the laws of thermodynamics and the conservation of energy are not
set in concrete. If we do not assume that the physical universe that we
are in is a closed system, we can introduce overdue revisions of
present laws.
The Joe cell is a conversion device that can ' cross ' over this border
or present day laws and extract and utilise the endless and unlimited
energy that is all around us and that the majority ignore.
Modern science has finally caught up, and now the concepts that the
cell works on are not on the lunatic fringe, in actuality it follows
well defined scientific rules.
Principle of all ' Free Energy Devices '.
The devices that do tap into this energy stream all utilise similar principles.
I will leave it to the reader to pursue other devices, but the present
topic is on the most elegant ( my opinion ) and simplest device of all,
the Joe cell.
Please try to understand these three principles, as all device use them in some form or other.
1. We must have a system that is not in balance or is unstable.
Thus, if we have a stable system or a system in equilibrium, there is
no reason for the system or cell to do work. Like a boulder that has
rolled down from the mountain top, once it reaches the valley there it
stays, static and in balance.
As Summers stated, " The energy from this storehouse ( ZPE ) is
available to man free of charge in vast quantities by the simple method
of changing the electromagnetic Balance ".
On the bye, he also stated that Orgone or Prana, is an AC electrical
current pulsating at an extremely high frequency. Now that is
interesting, keep it in the back of your mind for later use.
So for rule 1, our cell must not be in a stable state, it must be
seeking an equilibrium or a more stable point just like a boulder in
motion at the top of the mountain.
2. We must have a non-liner performance in the conversion.
This should be fairly evident, for what is the point of getting back a
result that is equivalent to the work that we have put into to get that
result. We must have an amplifying effect so that a very small input
will return a far larger gain. For example, it should require a very
small push on our 10 ton boulder to initiate an enormous amount of
energy as the boulder seeks equilibrium.
So for rule 2, our cell must get beyond stage 2 ( the seeding stage )
and become a non linear converter or accumulator for the ' energy '.
Stage 1 or plain electrolysis is useless and if you stay at this stage,
you will get either more or less gas production, period.
3. We must have our device ( the cell ) in a potential source of the energy.
This one is an easy one as all things on this planet are constantly
surrounded by an endless energy field that only requires the right type
of conversion device to utilise same.
So for rule 3, the experimenter does not have to make any provisions as
the cell is in this field, as is everything else.
As rule 3. takes care of itself, we are left with rule 1 and 2.
The question is, how does the cell and the operator utilise these rules
for the greatest benefit. In other words, how do we tap into the ZPE
force?
Rule 1.
Think about it, what can we do to the cell to make it unstable or out of balance?
Well, here are some,
a. We apply a potential difference ( our power source ) across a non linear resistance ( our chosen liquid )
b. This results in ionisation and electron flow that have different propagation rates.
c. This current flow results in the formation of a magnetic field and
if done correctly, ( due to the Lorenz law ), this field will rotate.
d. The electron density is vastly different on the outer positive and the inner negative due to cylinder surface area.
e. The creation of numerous and very small bubbles.
I see the key element here more the bursting ( abrupt shock ) of the
bubbles rather than the creation of same. This I see very closely
parallelling the sonoluminescence experiments and the resultant
manifestation of blue light that results from these experiments.
f. The creation of compartments or layers of dissimilar physical
characteristics. In our case stainless steel and water.
One or more of the above can break the at rest ( stable and balanced )
condition of the Zero Point Energy ( ZPE ) force in the vicinity of the
cell. The disturbance of the stable state of the ZPE will create a
reaction and this reaction coming back via our non linear cell will
provide more energy than what was required to instigate the action.
Please note that this reaction can be a ' push ' or a ' shove 'and the
cell can both act as a source or a sink for different applications.
Very important.
It is interesting to note that similar over unity devices by Meyer and
Puharich also use a method to shock ( with voltage pulses ) the ZPE,
with the result of non linear exchange with matter. In both cases water
( thus ion flow in part ) was the medium
As mentioned under (e.) above, I very much favour the effect that results from the collapsing air bubbles.
Claudia Eberlien ( Cambridge University 1996 ) talking on
sonoluminescence stated that a bubble of the minimum radius can cause
an increase in value of a thousandfold and we are only talking about
one bubble. I would suggest that this excess energy is from the ZPE
field.
Rule 2.
As mentioned above, Eberlien, Mizuno and many other have shown
anomalies with sonoluminescence experiments. These simply sated, were
an excesses of heat far beyond any possible test equipment or
laboratory measurement problems or anomalies.
Eberlien believes that the light ( the blue light of Orgone in my view
) is being emitted by the vacuum surrounding the bubble.
" Modern quantum theory holds that unseeable virtual photons ( as
mentioned above ) abound in the vacuum. The behaviour of these zero
point fluctuations is influenced by the properties of the surrounding
medium ".
Cheretski ( 1983 ) is another scientist happy with the above concepts,
namely, " ...vacuum energy can explain this mysterious effect.
...Emerging from below the ZPE level from ' nothing ' and returning to
' nothing ', virtual particles appear to defy the laws of conservation
of energy ".
As I have mentioned, if we remove the walls from this so called '
closed ' system of present day physics, we can readily introduce new
laws to replace invalid old ones.
Another non-linearity is the speed differential between the ion current
and the electron current in relation to the cell. There is a large time
difference in the propagation velocity of the two and this time
difference can be manipulated with suitable pulsing, or partial of
complete potential reversals.
This effect can be utilised to cause the ZPE to be accumulated or added in our cells.
I have stated many times the example of the child on the swing and the
importance of the parent providing the ' push ' or impetus at the exact
right time. Only with this synchronicity will the cell move from the
seeding to the breeding or stage 3 cycle. And just as importantly, to
go to stage 4, the push has to at least equal all possible external '
friction's ' or dampening agents on the cell.
Simplistically, I called the friction the leaking of the cell and our
stage 4 cell can overcome these, but the stage 3 cannot overcome all
possible interferences.
For additional information on the ion/electron effect, you may want to
read Tom Beardon's paper dated " Bearden on Bedini's negative
resistance effect - 04-09-2000 " and posted on Keelynet.
Power supply.
Preamble.
As you probably know, there are many speculations, myths, rumours,
guesses and so on as to what constitutes the ' right ' power supply. My
manual is interpreted incorrectly by some, so I want to again reinforce
what I did say, and not what some individuals think that I meant by
those statements.
Let me again remind you that when Joe ( and others ) started their
experiments with the intention of running cars on water, there were no
fancy power supplies and the Joe cell ' effect ' was unknown.
It was simply a matter of making as much gas as possible and to do
this, lots of current and electrolyte were the answer. I am going back
10 years and you simply have to watch a video of these early attempts
to confirm what I am saying.
That is still the way to go if you want to generate gas. Commercial
units are based on a lot of current, a lot of electrolyte, a lot of
heat and a lot of pressure. It is not where we want to go!
The early power supplies were car batteries and/or battery chargers.
The function of these power supplies was to electrolyse water and thus
generate hydrogen and oxygen. No attempts were made to separate the two
gasses and thus we ended up with a variety of gas combinations.
Depending on the quantity and type of electrolyte and also the current
passed through the cells, we had the production of water vapour, steam,
hydrogen, oxygen, Brown's gas and even atomic hydrogen plus trace
gasses that resulted from the various chemistry used as an electrolyte.
It was much later that experimenters realised that it was not the known
gasses that was required, but a mysterious gas or force that ran the
car without the requirement of brute electrolysis of large quantities
of water or even the gasses as we know them.
In fact, it was discovered that a very small current would suffice and
that the water was not even consumed, as we were not interested in
electrolysis for the sake of creating Brown's gas and thus running the
car on hydrogen.
With the discovery of the ' force ', methods were employed to increase
the cells ability to run in this mode, ie. to be a generator,
transformer or accumulator of this energy.
Unfortunately as this force is not very well understood, cannot be
readily seen or measured, the end result was total confusion.
It is only at this stage that the dimensions, power supply, materials
and water became important. As you all know plain old every day
electrolysis follows very well known rules and you only have to go to
your nearest electro-plating concern to see the methods in use.
Two piece of metal in a plastic bucket, some electrolyte, connect a car
battery to the metal plates, and hey presto, electrolysis!
The Joe cell is not an electro-plating device, in actuality we go to
great effort to prevent the migration of metallic ions. As we are not
interested in electro-plating, or the creation of hydrogen and oxygen,
we go to great effort to optimise the cell for its chosen task.
People that think that you can simply connect the above said bucket to
a car and then get free energy forever and ever, should really have
their heads examined. Think about it for heavens sake! It is that easy,
how come no one is doing it? Sheesh!
It is an art form, a skill, a special technique that belies the difficulties in the apparent simplicity.
For example, take a grain of wheat put it in light on a piece of wet
cotton wool and Bingo!, we have a plant. Easy hey? Yeah sure! Do you
realise the complexity of this simple result? The cell is the same.
Options.
There is a vast variety of possible power supplies, and some have been
mentioned by readers and experimenters. Unfortunately, included in the
suggestions is some very misleading guidance, deliberate or otherwise.
As I am not perfect and as I also do not know all the answers, all I
can do is to offer you advice and methods that I have found that work
for me. That is all that I would hope for from others.
This advice comes from years of hands on work, and is not merely
theories that may flash through my brain whilst watching my favourite
sporting event on TV, holding the mandatory beer firmly clasped in my
hand.
1. We must have some form of direct current, be it pulsations or an
offset on the AC. It is IMPOSSIBLE to have electrolysis with a pure
sine wave that comes from your power point! It make no difference if
you are in the Northern of Southern hemisphere or how you hold your
mouth or whatever. It is no go!
As a sine wave, be it 50 hZ or 60 hZ is equal and opposite for the same
time in one 360 degree period, the current will try to flow one way for
half to the time and the other way for the remainder. Equal and
opposite and thus no electrolysis.
I simply cannot understand why people insist that this will work, they simply could not have tried it.
Trust me guys, the people that recommend pure AC ( no matter what the
frequency ) are wrong. If you only use a mains transformer, the output
voltage, current or operating frequency abilities are irrelevant, you
have pure AC and it will not cause electrolysis!
2. HOWEVER, if we have a resultant offset current, either positive or
negative, this will result in periods of direct current that remains
passing through the cell in one direction, and we thus have
electrolysis. We must have some sort of unbalance.
This is simply achieved by rectifying the AC with a diode combination
and not utilising the filtering capacitor to smooth out the ripple. The
end result is a direct current with a very large ripple component, and
if you look inside any cheap battery charger, this is all that it
contains, a transformer, a diode and some protection circuitry and
maybe an ammeter.
3. The simple battery charger above, worked very well for many
experimenters including Joe for many, many years. There must be
hundreds of stage 3 cells that never saw anything better as a power
source. Sadly when the cell will not go to stage 3, people tend to
clutch at straws, to listen to the flavour of the month. This months
flavour is the ' special ' power supply.
4. Like all things, over the years the cell was refined and the power
supply as well. As you know, we now have stage 4 and stage 5 working
and who knows what next.
These later systems employ specialised power supplies. Before I tell
you what I know on this, let me very briefly define the two basic cell
utilisations.
A. The cell is designed for car work and as such it will be running
from 12 Volts. I will remind you here that the reason I chose 12 Volts
at 1 Amp as a standard are two fold.
One was, that the ammeter on the dash in Joe's car whilst running on the cell indicated 1.25 Amps.
The second was my hope that if everybody used the same standard ( 12
Volts, 1 Amp ), we could swap experimental data and thus achieve our
aims sooner. This second aim was a complete flop as in general, people
simply do not want to share.
As the cell has to run on 12 volts, I found that some water simply had
insufficient conductivity, ( too much internal resistance ) and would
not pass sufficient current for the desired effect. Thus I ( among many
others ) started experimenting with electrolytes. This is not a desired
feature but a case of necessity. Obviously, if you can get enough
electrolysis with 12 Volts, you do not have to add anything to the
water.
But, dear reader, I would just about guarantee you that in the above
case, the water was so full of natural or man made electrolytes that
the addition was already done for you.
And that goes for dear Joe and him not using electrolyte with 12 Volts.
B. The cell is designed for other non 12 Volt related applications. In
this case you definitely do not want to use electrolyte, as you can
tailor your power supply to deliver the exact current required.
Joe is using this method to start the cells of visitors and also to go
to stage 4. His supply has the ability of supplying far more than 12
volts and thus no electrolyte is required. In this case it can be said
that Joe does not use electrolyte and this is correct, as now the
statement is not taken out of context.
The supply.
In Joe's words and loosely translated, " ...I have made a power supply
that seems to adjust itself to the frequency that is required by any
cell...".
The above is all well and good, but I am sure that like myself you
would love to know how to do the above, whatever it means.
As you have read down his far, you will have realised that I am stating
that the shock or impulse that allows our cells to work must be of
sufficient magnitude and must have the right periodicity for us to
initially ' seed ' the cell and then to keep repeating this push or
shock at the right frequency to allow the ' breeding ' process to
continue. Additionally, the shock or pulse has to be of sufficient
magnitude to overcome the cells natural tendencies to ' leak '.
Now the above is a big ask, and various experimenters on many systems
have been trying to do this for years. Joe for one, by utilising a
simple and cheap second hand ex-Telecom power supply can do this and
this can be duplicated by others. After knowing the tricks that is.
Joe doe not use any additional components ( to the best of my knowledge
) he simply rewires the circuitry around the primary and secondary of
the transformer. This power supply modification allows the cell to work
in stage 4 mode.
Let me state at this point that any modification of power supplies or
mains connected appliances is illegal because it can be LETHAL!!!
There is not many more dangerous
combinations than water and electricity. I am not advising anybody to
modify anything or to tamper or change any mains connected appliance!
Far from it.
I am simply repeating what others have done with the aim of passing on
experimental knowledge to people versed in the required arts.
Moving on.
Joe is convinced that we are using electricity incorrectly and that we
are only using the ' positive '. In his view the modification to the
power supply are made to utilise the unused ' negative '.
To do this Joe disconnects the neutral end ( he calls neutral negative
) and places one or more of the secondary windings in series with the
primary. The resultant winding combination may be in or out of phase
with each other or the primary.
The above is a very old seldom but used method of voltage manipulation
with transformers and lethal if the experimenter accidentally uses the
active or if the house wiring is transposed.
Obviously the person that touches this type of power supply can
experience a LETHAL shock if he completes the circuit with his body to
earth or neutral. This by the way is also the danger of using a '
Variac ' or auto transformer, you have no isolation between the primary
and secondary.
I have deliberately written the ' secret ' in such a way that people
who are not conversant with the methods do not understand it. It is the
least that I can do to protect the dabbler from himself.
Even for the experienced experimenters, you too will realise the DANGER
of such modification in the hands of the general public.
The above modifications will make a power supply for stage 4 cells and is the system as used and described by Joe .
I am simply passing on what has been done by Joe, I AM NOT SUGGESTING THAT ANYBODY DOES IT AS IS CAN AND
WILL KILL SOMEBODY!!!!
Summary.
I think that the operation of the cell relies for the utilisation of the ZPE in some way.
To utilise the ZPE a shock or pulse of the right periodicity and magnitude is required.
A power supply can be made to do this.
However as the power supply now becomes LETHAL, the construction and
use is not recommended for the average non conversant experimenter.
I am making you aware of the dangers involved and strongly discourage
any device that me kill you or your loved ones, or anybody else.
In closing, a normal power supply will get you up to stage 3, and if
you cannot get this far there is no point in endangering yourself and
other by making lethal modifications.
***********************************************************