10-02-2002
The Joe Cell and the ' Y ' factor.
Definition.
The ' Y '
factor is the ability of the operator ( or any radiating body in the
near vicinity ), to interact with the device and cause either an
enhancement or diminishment in its desired performance.
I have named it the ' Y ' factor for ' you ' after Reich suggested that
his Orgone motor required a ' Y ' factor for its correct operation. As
Reich's documents are still locked away and thus unseen, I cannot
guarantee that definition from Reich's point of view. It remains to be
seen if we have the same definition for ' Y '.
General.
What the experimenter really should know is, what proof is there in
science that an organic structure can interact with a non organic
structure. Or put in simpler terms, can the presence of a person affect
the outcome of an experiment and vice versa?
For the well read amongst you, there is a resounding yes to the above
question as it has been proven thousands of times in metaphysical type
experiments such as spoon bending, mediumship, alternative healing and
the feats of certain religious groups.
However for the sceptical, once bitten twice shy individual, the above
are merely non scientific sleight of hand, fraud, trickery,
coincidences, chance events or freak occurrences that can be easily
debunked by such great ' Gurus ' as the ' great ' Randi ( the debunkers
God ) and the blinkered lot from the Sceptic societies.
Please don't misunderstand me, these people do and have done much good
to protect the innocent from the con artists. However they also seem to
lose quite a few babies when they throw out the bath water.
It would be nice to have solid proof from the scientific fraternity, to
at least show your doubting friends and/or to give even you dear reader
a bit more faith in the phenomenon.
Quantum physics.
Basically the theory that energy does not have continuous range of
values, but instead it has a discontinuity and this energy is composed
of finite units called quanta.
By this science agrees in the main to the theory, that our world is not
a continuous construction nor is it solid. On the contrary our world
actually ' exists ' as short and rapid bursts of light or quanta.
From the above it can be easily deducted that as the world is not solid
or as it does not have a continuous existence, then we can have '
magical ' events where objects can appear or disappear and where time
can be gained or lost.
In actuality, an outcome called the ' Bose-Einstein condensate ' allows
for two atoms to occupy the same point. These events have been observed
and even seen with the naked eye as well as being photographed. (
Satinover 1997 )
As the above in practice would allow for the concept of parallel
universes, we can see the far reaching implication of our Joe cell and
the source of the cell's power.
In passing Hugh Everett from Princetown University covered the above topic in 1957.
I introduced Quantum physics to show you that the ' Y ' factor can be
acting on several dimensions and in years to come will have a very
logical explanation for the effect. Similarly, it shows that what we
call reality is not as ' firm' or solid as we believed it was.
This was known thousands of years ago with the ' Maya ' concept,
stating that we live in an illusion that we call reality, and our
scientists have merely rediscovered a very old and well trodden path.
Matter.
As quantum physics start to shatter the illusion of what we call
reality, it comes down to the question of what in actuality is ' matter
'?. For if there is no continuity or ' solidity ', including the Joe
cell or us, where does it leave the established laws?
Let me quote you the great Max Planck, a Nobel prize winner:
" There is no matter as such! All matter originates and exists only by
virtue of a force which brings the particles of an atom to vibration
and holds this most minute solar system together....We must assume
behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind.
This mind is the Matrix of all matter.".
There dear reader you have the crux of the situation. If there is no
matter as such, and if matter is held together by the conscious mind,
then we as part of the same construct ( conscious mind ) interact with
all and everything.
As I would rather stick to science ( imperfect as it may be ) then wade
into the depths of religion ( a no win situation in any debate ), I
will leave it at that for you to ponder on if you so wish.
Let me show you only a few examples of the type of interaction on the
scientific level that may suffice. It follows that the action can be
from a device to a human as well as from a human to a device.
Examples.
A. V. Chernetski. Moscow 1983.
From the book ' Systems of Plasma with separation of charges ', page 91.
Figure 10 shows the reaction of the human body to the operation of devices utilising the Zero Point Energy ( ZPE ).
In this example there is scientific proof of a device affecting the operator in very specific ways.
Viktor S. Grebennikov. Senior researcher, Russian Academy of Science.
From the book ' My world '. There is a copy on Keelynet ( thank you Slavek for the translation )
Like the first example, Viktor talks about many side effect whilst on
his ' anti-gravity ' platform and whilst near certain shape forms.
Included in the above are some simple experiments that you can do at
very low cost, and thus prove this factor for yourself.
Glen Rein & Rollin McCraty. Third annual conference of the
International Society for the Study of Subtle Energies, 1993.
It has been shown that emotion can actually change the physical
molecule of DNA. " individuals trained in generating focused feeling of
deep love...were able to intentionally cause a change in the shape of
the DNA ".
The above shows that a controlled though can alter something. By logic
it would follow, that the state of a person is also some form of ' at
rest ' energy field and this field will also interact with other fields.
Richard Broughton. Director of Research at the Institute for Parapsychology in North Carolina.
In his analysis of contemporary psychokinesis research, he proves
conclusively and beyond any doubt that people can interact with inert
objects and get these objects to perform as directed by the scientists.
Again, it is only a small step to make in me saying that the observer
that you invited to watch your Joe cell at work, will have a unique '
output ' that he may not be aware of.
I am simply saying that a mindset can disturb your experiment by reacting with the cell in a positive or negative way.
Experiments in Distance Influence. L. L. Vasoliev.
Professor of Physiology as the University of Lenningrad.
A good read with many examples of recorded scientific experiments of
deliberate manipulations of various devices. This book also supplies
some characteristic of the ' enemations'.
In a Nutshell.
I can quote you books upon books of documented mind over matter
scientifically observed and carried out experiments, but it is not my
job to convince you of anything. I simply bring it to your attention,
believe it or not.
The proof is as close as your nearest library and the effort that you are prepared to make to attain knowledge.
Some points that may be worth considering:
1. Mankind simply does not ' know ' anything. We only have theories and
these theories are constantly being upgraded as new experiments refine
our knowledge. As such there is no theory or law that is set in
concrete. We simply do not understand all the possible variables to be
able to formulate definite and thus unchangeable laws.
2. As we only have theories, for someone to say that it is impossible
for the external environment to affect a Joe cell is pure nonsense. Of
course if they were prepared to prove it, hey!, we have a new ball game.
3. As we are part of the environment and are ' broadcasting ' a whole
range of frequencies, it is not too outlandish to suggest that these
frequencies may interact with the frequencies of the materials and
their operation, that makes up the Joe cell device.
4. If point (3.) above is plausible, it follows by logic, that this
interaction may be additive or subtractive in such a way as to make the
cell function ' better ' or ' worse '.
5. The end result is, that the human as well as the natural and man
made complex frequency bands ( and harmonics resultant ) is a very
important consideration in the research on subtle energy devices.
Summary.
Science has proven that there is a two way interaction that exists
between all things (on this planet at least ). That is a fact! That is
also the ' Y ' factor.
I would strongly suggest to the serious experiment to be aware of the '
Y ' factor and not treat it as some sort of fairy tale.
Simply because the majority of ' sheeples ' on this planet are only
aware of what is purported to be ' fact ' in media releases, it is very
easy to throw away the baby with the bath water.
**********************************************